A bunch of environmental destruction comes from industrial farming too, though, so overall no farmers would be a net positive for the environment.
Wow, hot take. I imagine you’re the first person in the lineup to starve to death, ahead of all those brown folks, eh.
Oh you’re spicy. Did you think I actually believe we should all just lie down and die? Like yeah I have days where that’s pretty high on my agenda, but I definitely prefer the current status quo of us slowly extinguishing ourselves in a hell of our own making. xoxo
we should probably encourage the farmers to do their work outside the environment.
Mars? Or were you thinking more along the lines of the Alpha Centauri neighborhood?
TBH I’m not really sure. I know there is a ship there though. Well part of a ship.
dont missunderstood me, i clearly agree ;)
The environmental farmers exists, they are not showned,
Even the Agroecology is not a common word, today,No farmers > no cities
It would be positive as fuck for the environment!
Living in a city is better for the environment than living in a rural community. Many efficiencies to be gained by having things close together. Less land use, less pollution (yes, really), less energy use, fewer resources to spend on infrastructure.
Cities are good for the environment unless the alternative is killing their inhabitants. But i should hope we’re not advocating for that.
