• magic_lobster_party
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          How is distributing artist’s work freely without compensation or their permission helping them?

          • Amerikan Pharaoh
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            How is licking the boots of the copyright office helping the people? I don’t give the first fuck about individuals trying to hoard up IP anymore; IP hoarding-- and the very concept of IP in the first place-- is fuckin bullshit, fuck 'em if they got a problem with that take. We already have to pay through the nose for too much else in society, so why are you licking copyright-uplifting boots?

            • magic_lobster_party
              link
              fedilink
              07 months ago

              Authors have the right to be compensated for their work. There are many things that are wrong with current copyright, but denying artists compensation for their work is not the way.

              Wouldn’t you also be mad if your salary was denied?

              • Amerikan Pharaoh
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                I live every day of my life under a regime that steals my wages, calls it ‘profit’, and then in my face, gets away with pocketing it, with STEALING IT; that shit is ALREADY happening. At this point, it’d just even the playing field. If you want me to have solidarity with my fellow worker, you cannot have it both ways where you expect me to uplift the tools of capitalist theft too. Fuck out of my face if all you have is platitudes to capital.

                  • Amerikan Pharaoh
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    And your attempted redress is bootlicking the mechanics by which capitalists steal from all of us. Sinclair was right; it really is impossible to get you people to understand shit when your material conditions are dependent on your not. And then you just smug around like you said some prosaic shit I am so sick of y’all.

    • @Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      407 months ago

      For me it’s not boot licking but recognizing that IA made a huge unforced error that may cost us all not just that digital lending program but stuff like the Wayback Machine and all the other good projects the IA runs.

      • @fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        107 months ago

        Exactly. Less bootlickering and more “Leopards Ate My Face” material. This was heavily forseable. If they did this as a protest against copyright and announced it from the start, it would be one thing. But this was just incompetence and ignorance at a level that will likely ruin them.

    • magic_lobster_party
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The only change that will come out of this is that IA will pay a huge bill. They’re too small to even make a nudge to the copyright laws.

      I just hope this pointless move won’t bring down the wayback machine.

      • @ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        27 months ago

        I just hope this pointless move won’t bring down the wayback machine.

        What was the pointless move you’re referring to?

        • magic_lobster_party
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Stir up the hornets nest by freely distributing copyrighted physical media. The only outcome is that they will get stung.

    • AnonStoleMyPants
      link
      fedilink
      67 months ago

      And now they nuked the entire IA.

      Well done.

      Intentions were probably correct but this result is kinda ass.